Axmi-004, a delta-endotoxin gene and methods for its use

ABSTRACT

Compositions and methods for conferring pesticidal activity to bacteria, plants, plant cells, tissues and seeds are provided. Compositions comprising a coding sequence for a delta-endotoxin polypeptide are provided. The coding sequences can be used in DNA constructs or expression cassettes for transformation and expression in plants and bacteria. Compositions also comprise transformed bacteria, plants, plant cells, tissues, and seeds. In particular, isolated delta-endotoxin nucleic acid molecules are provided. Additionally, amino acid sequences corresponding to the polynucleotides are encompassed. In particular, the present invention provides for isolated nucleic acid molecules comprising nucleotide sequences encoding the amino acid sequences shown in SEQ ID NOS:3 and 5, and the nucleotide sequences set forth in SEQ ID NOS:1, 2, and 4, as well as variants and fragments thereof.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No.10/782,020, filed Feb. 19, 2004, which claims the benefit of U.S.Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/448,810, filed Feb. 20, 2003, eachof which is hereby incorporated in its entirety by reference herein.

REFERENCE TO SEQUENCE LISTING SUBMITTED ELECTRONICALLY

The official copy of the sequence listing is submitted electronicallyvia EFS-Web as an ASCII formatted sequence listing with a file named“339132_SequenceListing.txt”, created on Feb. 4, 2008, and having a sizeof 74,548 bytes and is filed concurrently with the specification. Thesequence listing contained in this ASCII formatted document is part ofthe specification and is herein incorporated by reference in itsentirety.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to the field of molecular biology. Provided arenovel genes that encode pesticidal proteins. These proteins and thenucleic acid sequences that encode them are useful in preparingpesticidal formulations and in the production of transgenicpest-resistant plants.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Bacillus thuringiensis is a Gram-positive spore forming soil bacteriumcharacterized by its ability to produce crystalline inclusions that arespecifically toxic to certain orders and species of insects, but areharmless to plants and other non-targeted organisms. For this reason,compositions including Bacillus thuringiensis strains or theirinsecticidal proteins can be used as environmentally acceptableinsecticides to control agricultural insect pests or insect vectors fora variety of human or animal diseases.

Crystal (Cry) proteins (delta-endotoxins) from Bacillus thuringiensishave potent insecticidal activity against predominantly Lepidopteran,Dipteran, and Coleopteran larvae. These proteins also have shownactivity against Hymenoptera, Homoptera, Phthiraptera, Mallophaga, andAcari pest orders, as well as other invertebrate orders such asNemathelminthes, Platyhelminthes, and Sarcomastigorphora (Feitelson(1993) The Bacillus Thuringiensis family tree. In Advanced EngineeredPesticides. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, N.Y.) These proteins wereoriginally classified as CryI to CryV based primarily on theirinsecticidal activity. The major classes were Lepidoptera-specific (I),Lepidoptera- and Diptera-specific (II), Coleoptera-specific (III),Diptera-specific (IV), and nematode-specific (V) and (VI). The proteinswere further classified into subfamilies; more highly related proteinswithin each family were assigned divisional letters such as CryIA,CryIB, Cry1C, etc. Even more closely related proteins within eachdivision were given names such as Cry1C1, Cry1C2, etc.

A new nomenclature was recently described for the Cry genes based uponamino acid sequence homology rather than insect target specificity(Crickmore et al. (1998) Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 62:807-813). In thenew classification, each toxin is assigned a unique name incorporating aprimary rank (an Arabic number), a secondary rank (an uppercase letter),a tertiary rank (a lowercase letter), and a quaternary rank (anotherArabic number). In the new classification, Roman numerals have beenexchanged for Arabic numerals in the primary rank. Proteins with lessthan 45% sequence identity have different primary ranks, and thecriteria for secondary and tertiary ranks are 78% and 95%, respectively.

The crystal protein does not exhibit insecticidal activity until it hasbeen ingested and solubilized in the insect midgut. The ingestedprotoxin is hydrolyzed by proteases in the insect digestive tract to anactive toxic molecule. (Höfte and Whiteley (1989) Microbiol. Rev.53:242-255). This toxin binds to apical brush border receptors in themidgut of the target larvae and inserts into the apical membranecreating ion channels or pores, resulting in larval death.

Delta-endotoxins generally have five conserved sequence domains, andthree conserved structural domains (see, for example, de Maagd et al.(2001) Trends Genetics 17:193-199). The first conserved structuraldomain consists of seven alpha helices and is involved in membraneinsertion and pore formation. Domain II consists of three beta-sheetsarranged in a Greek key configuration, and domain III consists of twoantiparallel beta-sheets in ‘jelly-roll’ formation (de Maagd et al.(2001) supra). Domains II and III are involved in receptor recognitionand binding, and are therefore considered determinants of toxinspecificity.

Because of the devastation that insects can confer, there is a continualneed to discover new forms of Bacillus thuringiensis delta-endotoxins.

SUMMARY OF INVENTION

Compositions and methods for conferring pesticide resistance tobacteria, plants, plant cells, tissues, and seeds are provided.Compositions include isolated nucleic acid molecules encoding sequencesfor delta-endotoxin polypeptides, vectors comprising those nucleic acidmolecules, and host cells comprising the vectors. Compositions alsoinclude isolated or recombinant polypeptide sequences of the endotoxin,compositions comprising these polypeptides, and antibodies to thosepolypeptides. The nucleotide sequences can be used in DNA constructs orexpression cassettes for transformation and expression in organisms,including microorganisms and plants. The nucleotide or amino acidsequences may be synthetic sequences that have been designed for optimumexpression in an organism including, but not limited to, a microorganismor a plant. Compositions also comprise transformed bacteria, plants,plant cells, tissues, and seeds.

In particular, the present invention provides for isolated nucleic acidmolecules comprising the nucleotide sequences encoding the amino acidsequences shown in SEQ ID NOS:3 and 5 and the nucleotide sequences setforth in SEQ ID NOS:1, 2, and 4, as well as variants and fragmentsthereof. Nucleotide sequences that are complementary to a nucleotidesequence of the invention, or that hybridize to a sequence of theinvention are also encompassed.

Methods are provided for producing the polypeptides of the invention,and for using those polypeptides for controlling or killing alepidopteran or coleopteran pest.

The compositions and methods of the invention are useful for theproduction of organisms with pesticide resistance, specifically bacteriaand plants. These organisms and compositions derived from them aredesirable for agricultural purposes. The compositions of the inventionare also useful for generating altered or improved delta-endotoxinproteins that have pesticidal activity, or for detecting the presence ofdelta-endotoxin proteins or nucleic acids in products or organisms.

DESCRIPTION OF FIGURES

FIGS. 1A and B show an alignment of AXMI-004 (SEQ ID NO:3) with cry1Ac(SEQ ID NO:6), cry1Ca (SEQ ID NO:7), cry2Aa (SEQ ID NO:8), cry3Aa1 (SEQID NO:9), cry1Ia (SEQ ID NO:10), and cry7Aa (SEQ ID NO:11). Toxinshaving C-terminal non-toxic domains were artificially truncated asshown. Conserved group 1 is found from about amino acid residue 174 toabout 196 of SEQ ID NO:3. Conserved group 2 is found from about aminoacid residue 250 to about 292 of SEQ ID NO:3. Conserved group 3 is foundfrom about amino acid residue 476 to about 521 of SEQ ID NO:3. Conservedgroup 4 is found from about amino acid residue 542 to about 552 of SEQID NO:3. Conserved group 5 is found from about amino acid residue 618 toabout 628 of SEQ ID NO:3.

FIG. 2 shows a photograph of a 4-20% gradient SDS acrylamide gel. Lanes1-4 contain various concentrations of sporulated Bacillus cell cultureexpressing 69 kD AXMI-004 protein. Lanes 5-8 contain variousconcentrations of BSA. Lane 9 contains a size marker. An arrow indicatesthe 69 kD band.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The present invention is drawn to compositions and methods forregulating pest resistance in organisms, particularly plants or plantcells. The methods involve transforming organisms with a nucleotidesequence encoding a delta-endotoxin protein of the invention. Inparticular, the nucleotide sequences of the invention are useful forpreparing plants and microorganisms that possess pesticidal activity.Thus, transformed bacteria, plants, plant cells, plant tissues and seedsare provided. Compositions are delta-endotoxin nucleic acids andproteins of Bacillus thuringiensis. The sequences find use in theconstruction of expression vectors for subsequent transformation intoorganisms of interest, as probes for the isolation of otherdelta-endotoxin genes, and for the generation of altered pesticidalproteins by methods known in the art, such as domain swapping or DNAshuffling. The proteins find use in controlling or killing lepidopteranor coleopteran pest populations and for producing compositions withpesticidal activity.

DEFINITIONS

By “delta-endotoxin” is intended a toxin from Bacillus thuringiensisthat has toxic activity against one or more pests, including, but notlimited to, members of the Lepidoptera, Diptera, and Coleoptera orders.In some cases, delta-endotoxin proteins have been isolated from otherorganisms, including Clostridium bifermentans and Paenibacilluspopilliae. Delta-endotoxin proteins include amino acid sequences deducedfrom the full-length nucleotide sequences disclosed herein, and aminoacid sequences that are shorter than the full-length sequences, eitherdue to the use of an alternate downstream start site, or due toprocessing that produces a shorter protein having pesticidal activity.Processing may occur in the organism the protein is expressed in, or inthe pest after ingestion of the protein. Delta-endotoxins includeproteins identified as cry1 through cry43, cyt1 and cyt2, and Cyt-liketoxin. There are currently over 250 known species of delta-endotoxinswith a wide range of specificities and toxicities. For an expansive listsee Crickmore et al. (1998), Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 62:807-813, andfor regular updates see Crickmore et al. (2003) “Bacillus thuringiensistoxin nomenclature,” atwww.biols.susx.ac.uk/Home/Neil_Crickmore/Bt/index.

Bacterial genes, such as the AXMI-004 gene of this invention, quiteoften possess multiple methionine initiation codons in proximity to thestart of the open reading frame. Often, translation initiation at one ormore of these start codons will lead to generation of a functionalprotein. These start codons can include ATG codons. However, bacteriasuch as Bacillus sp. also recognize the codon GTG as a start codon, andproteins that initiate translation at GTG codons contain a methionine atthe first amino acid. Furthermore, it is not often determined a prioriwhich of these codons are used naturally in the bacterium. Thus, it isunderstood that use of one of the alternate methionine codons may alsolead to generation of delta-endotoxin proteins that encode pesticidalactivity. For example, an alternate start site for a delta-endotoxinprotein of the invention is at base pair 385 of SEQ ID NO:1. Translationfrom this alternate start site results in the amino acid sequence foundin SEQ ID NO:5. These delta-endotoxin proteins are encompassed in thepresent invention and may be used in the methods of the presentinvention.

By “plant cell” is intended all known forms of plant, includingundifferentiated tissue (e.g. callus), suspension culture cells,protoplasts, leaf cells, root cells, phloem cells, plant seeds, pollen,propagules, embryos and the like. By “plant expression cassette” isintended a DNA construct that is capable of resulting in the expressionof a protein from an open reading frame in a plant cell. Typically thesecontain a promoter and a coding sequence. Often, such constructs willalso contain a 3′ untranslated region. Such constructs may contain a‘signal sequence’ or ‘leader sequence’ to facilitate co-translational orpost-translational transport of the peptide to certain intracellularstructures such as the chloroplast (or other plastid), endoplasmicreticulum, or Golgi apparatus.

By “signal sequence” is intended a sequence that is known or suspectedto result in cotranslational or post-translational peptide transportacross the cell membrane. In eukaryotes, this typically involvessecretion into the Golgi apparatus, with some resulting glycosylation.By “leader sequence” is intended any sequence that when translated,results in an amino acid sequence sufficient to trigger co-translationaltransport of the peptide chain to a sub-cellular organelle. Thus, thisincludes leader sequences targeting transport and/or glycosylation bypassage into the endoplasmic reticulum, passage to vacuoles, plastidsincluding chloroplasts, mitochondria, and the like.

By “plant transformation vector” is intended a DNA molecule that isnecessary for efficient transformation of a plant cell. Such a moleculemay consist of one or more plant expression cassettes, and may beorganized into more than one ‘vector’ DNA molecule. For example, binaryvectors are plant transformation vectors that utilize two non-contiguousDNA vectors to encode all requisite cis- and trans-acting functions fortransformation of plant cells (Hellens and Mullineaux (2000) Trends inPlant Science 5:446-451). “Vector” refers to a nucleic acid constructdesigned for transfer between different host cells. “Expression vector”refers to a vector that has ability to incorporate, integrate andexpress heterologous DNA sequences or fragments in a foreign cell.

“Transgenic plants” or “transformed plants” or “stably transformedplants or cells or tissues” refers to plants that have incorporated orintegrated exogenous nucleic acid sequences or DNA fragments into theplant cell. These nucleic acid sequences include those that areexogenous, or not present in the untransformed plant cell, as well asthose that may be endogenous, or present in the untransformed plantcell. “Heterologous” generally refers to the nucleic acid sequences thatare not endogenous to the cell or part of the native genome in whichthey are present, and have been added to the cell by infection,transfection, microinjection, electroporation, microprojection, or thelike.

“Promoter” refers to a nucleic acid sequence that functions to directtranscription of a downstream coding sequence. The promoter togetherwith other transcriptional and translational regulatory nucleic acidsequences (also termed “control sequences”) are necessary for theexpression of a DNA sequence of interest.

Provided herein are novel isolated nucleotide sequences that conferpesticidal activity. Also provided are the amino acid sequences for thedelta-endotoxin proteins. The protein resulting from translation of thisgene allows cells to control or kill pests that ingest it.

An “isolated” or “purified” nucleic acid molecule or protein, orbiologically active portion thereof, is substantially free of othercellular material, or culture medium when produced by recombinanttechniques, or substantially free of chemical precursors or otherchemicals when chemically synthesized. Preferably, an “isolated” nucleicacid is free of sequences (preferably protein encoding sequences) thatnaturally flank the nucleic acid (i.e., sequences located at the 5′ and3′ ends of the nucleic acid) in the genomic DNA of the organism fromwhich the nucleic acid is derived. For purposes of the invention,“isolated” when used to refer to nucleic acid molecules excludesisolated chromosomes. For example, in various embodiments, the isolateddelta-endotoxin-encoding nucleic acid molecule can contain less thanabout 5 kb, 4 kb, 3 kb, 2 kb, 1 kb, 0.5 kb, or 0.1 kb of nucleotidesequence that naturally flanks the nucleic acid molecule in genomic DNAof the cell from which the nucleic acid is derived. A delta-endotoxinprotein that is substantially free of cellular material includespreparations of protein having less than about 30%, 20%, 10%, or 5% (bydry weight) of non-delta-endotoxin protein (also referred to herein as a“contaminating protein”). Various aspects of the invention are describedin further detail in the following subsections.

Isolated Nucleic Acid Molecules, and Variants and Fragments thereof

One aspect of the invention pertains to isolated nucleic acid moleculescomprising nucleotide sequences encoding delta-endotoxin proteins andpolypeptides or biologically active portions thereof, as well as nucleicacid molecules sufficient for use as hybridization probes to identifydelta-endotoxin encoding nucleic acids. As used herein, the term“nucleic acid molecule” is intended to include DNA molecules (e.g., cDNAor genomic DNA) and RNA molecules (e.g., mRNA) and analogs of the DNA orRNA generated using nucleotide analogs. The nucleic acid molecule can besingle-stranded or double-stranded, but preferably is double-strandedDNA.

Nucleotide sequences encoding the proteins of the present inventioninclude the sequences set forth in SEQ ID NOS: 1, 2, and 4, andcomplements thereof. By “complement” is intended a nucleotide sequencethat is sufficiently complementary to a given nucleotide sequence suchthat it can hybridize to the given nucleotide sequence to thereby form astable duplex. The corresponding amino acid sequences for thedelta-endotoxin proteins encoded by these nucleotide sequences are setforth in SEQ ID NOS:3 and 5.

Nucleic acid molecules that are fragments of thesedelta-endotoxin-encoding nucleotide sequences are also encompassed bythe present invention. By “fragment” is intended a portion of thenucleotide sequence encoding a delta-endotoxin protein. A fragment of anucleotide sequence may encode a biologically active portion of adelta-endotoxin protein, or it may be a fragment that can be used as ahybridization probe or PCR primer using methods disclosed below. Nucleicacid molecules that are fragments of a delta-endotoxin nucleotidesequence comprise at least about 15, 20, 50, 75, 100, 200, 300, 350,400, 450, 500, 550, 600, 650, 700, 750, 800, 850, 900, 950, 1000, 1050,1100, 1150, 1200, 1250, 1300, 1350, 1400, 1450, 1500, 1550, 1600, 1650,1700, 1750, 1800, 1850 nucleotides, or up to the number of nucleotidespresent in a full-length delta-endotoxin-encoding nucleotide sequencedisclosed herein (for example, 2190 nucleotides for SEQ ID NO:1, 1890nucleotides for SEQ ID NO:2, and 1806 nucleotides for SEQ ID NO:4)depending upon the intended use. Fragments of the nucleotide sequencesof the present invention will encode protein fragments that retain thebiological activity of the delta-endotoxin protein and, hence, retainpesticidal activity. By “retains activity” is intended that the fragmentwill have at least about 30%, preferably at least about 50%, morepreferably at least about 70%, even more preferably at least about 80%of the pesticidal activity of the delta-endotoxin protein. Methods formeasuring pesticidal activity are well known in the art. See, forexample, Czapla and Lang (1990) J. Econ. Entomol. 83(6): 2480-2485;Andrews et al. (1988) Biochem. J. 252:199-206; Marrone et al. (1985) J.of Economic Entomology 78:290-293; and U.S. Pat. No. 5,743,477, all ofwhich are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety.

A fragment of a delta-endotoxin encoding nucleotide sequence thatencodes a biologically active portion of a protein of the invention willencode at least about 15, 25, 30, 50, 75, 100, 125, 150, 175, 200, 250,300, 350, 400, 450, 500, 550, or 600 contiguous amino acids, or up tothe total number of amino acids present in a full-length delta-endotoxinprotein of the invention (for example, 629 amino acids for SEQ ID NO:3and 601 for SEQ ID NO:5).

Preferred delta-endotoxin proteins of the present invention are encodedby a nucleotide sequence sufficiently identical to a nucleotide sequenceof SEQ ID NO:1, 2, or 4. By “sufficiently identical” is intended anamino acid or nucleotide sequence that has at least about 60% or 65%sequence identity, preferably about 70% or 75% sequence identity, morepreferably about 80% or 85% sequence identity, most preferably about90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98% or 99% sequence identitycompared to a reference sequence using one of the alignment programsdescribed herein using standard parameters. One of skill in the art willrecognize that these values can be appropriately adjusted to determinecorresponding identity of proteins encoded by two nucleotide sequencesby taking into account codon degeneracy, amino acid similarity, readingframe positioning, and the like.

To determine the percent identity of two amino acid sequences or of twonucleic acids, the sequences are aligned for optimal comparisonpurposes. The percent identity between the two sequences is a functionof the number of identical positions shared by the sequences (i.e.,percent identity=number of identical positions/total number of positions(e.g., overlapping positions)×100). In one embodiment, the two sequencesare the same length. The percent identity between two sequences can bedetermined using techniques similar to those described below, with orwithout allowing gaps. In calculating percent identity, typically exactmatches are counted.

The determination of percent identity between two sequences can beaccomplished using a mathematical algorithm. A nonlimiting example of amathematical algorithm utilized for the comparison of two sequences isthe algorithm of Karlin and Altschul (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA87:2264, modified as in Karlin and Altschul (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad.Sci. USA 90:5873-5877. Such an algorithm is incorporated into the BLASTNand BLASTX programs of Altschul et al. (1990) J. Mol. Biol. 215:403.BLAST nucleotide searches can be performed with the BLASTN program,score=100, wordlength=12, to obtain nucleotide sequences homologous todelta-endotoxin nucleic acid molecules of the invention. BLAST proteinsearches can be performed with the BLASTX program, score=50,wordlength=3, to obtain amino acid sequences homologous todelta-endotoxin protein molecules of the invention. To obtain gappedalignments for comparison purposes, Gapped BLAST can be utilized asdescribed in Altschul et al. (1997) Nucleic Acids Res. 25:3389.Alternatively, PSI-Blast can be used to perform an iterated search thatdetects distant relationships between molecules. See Altschul et al.(1997) supra. When utilizing BLAST, Gapped BLAST, and PSI-Blastprograms, the default parameters of the respective programs (e.g.,BLASTX and BLASTN) can be used. See, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Anothernon-limiting example of a mathematical algorithm utilized for thecomparison of sequences is the ClustalW algorithm (Higgins et al. (1994)Nucleic Acids Res. 22:4673-4680). ClustalW compares sequences and alignsthe entirety of the amino acid or DNA sequence, and thus can providedata about the sequence conservation of the entire amino acid sequence.The ClustalW algorithm is used in several commercially availableDNA/amino acid analysis software packages, such as the ALIGNX module ofthe vector NTi Program Suite (Informax, Inc). After alignment of aminoacid sequences with ClustalW, the percent amino acid identity can beassessed. A non-limiting example of a software program useful foranalysis of ClustalW alignments is GeneDoc™. Genedoc™ (Karl Nicholas)allows assessment of amino acid (or DNA) similarity and identity betweenmultiple proteins. Another non-limiting example of a mathematicalalgorithm utilized for the comparison of sequences is the algorithm ofMyers and Miller (1988) CABIOS 4:11-17. Such an algorithm isincorporated into the ALIGN program (version 2.0), which is part of theGCG sequence alignment software package (available from Accelrys, Inc.,9865 Scranton Rd., San Diego, Calif., USA). When utilizing the ALIGNprogram for comparing amino acid sequences, a PAM120 weight residuetable, a gap length penalty of 12, and a gap penalty of 4 can be used.

A preferred program is GAP version 10, which used the algorithm ofNeedleman and Wunsch (1970) supra. GAP Version 10 may be used with thefollowing parameters: % identity and % similarity for a nucleotidesequence using GAP Weight of 50 and Length Weight of 3, and thenwsgapdna.cmp scoring matrix; % identity and % similarity for an aminoacid sequence using GAP Weight of 8 and Length Weight of 2, and theBLOSUM62 Scoring Matrix. Equivalent programs may also be used. By“equivalent program” is intended any sequence comparison program that,for any two sequences in question, generates an alignment havingidentical nucleotide or amino acid residue matches and an identicalpercent sequence identity when compared to the corresponding alignmentgenerated by GAP Version 10.

The invention also encompasses variant nucleic acid molecules.“Variants” of the delta-endotoxin-encoding nucleotide sequences includethose sequences that encode the delta-endotoxin proteins disclosedherein but that differ conservatively because of the degeneracy of thegenetic code as well as those that are sufficiently identical asdiscussed above. Naturally occurring allelic variants can be identifiedwith the use of well-known molecular biology techniques, such aspolymerase chain reaction (PCR) and hybridization techniques as outlinedbelow. Variant nucleotide sequences also include synthetically derivednucleotide sequences that have been generated, for example, by usingsite-directed mutagenesis but which still encode the delta-endotoxinproteins disclosed in the present invention as discussed below. Variantproteins encompassed by the present invention are biologically active,that is they continue to possess the desired biological activity of thenative protein, that is, retaining pesticidal activity. By “retainsactivity” is intended that the variant will have at least about 30%,preferably at least about 50%, more preferably at least about 70%, evenmore preferably at least about 80% of the pesticidal activity of thenative protein. Methods for measuring pesticidal activity are well knownin the art. See, for example, Czapla and Lang (1990) J. Econ. Entomol.83(6): 2480-2485; Andrews et al. (1988) Biochem. J. 252:199-206; Marroneet al. (1985) J. of Economic Entomology 78:290-293; and U.S. Pat. No.5,743,477, all of which are herein incorporated by reference in theirentirety.

The skilled artisan will further appreciate that changes can beintroduced by mutation into the nucleotide sequences of the inventionthereby leading to changes in the amino acid sequence of the encodeddelta-endotoxin proteins, without altering the biological activity ofthe proteins. Thus, variant isolated nucleic acid molecules can becreated by introducing one or more nucleotide substitutions, additions,or deletions into the corresponding nucleotide sequence disclosedherein, such that one or more amino acid substitutions, additions ordeletions are introduced into the encoded protein. Mutations can beintroduced by standard techniques, such as site-directed mutagenesis andPCR-mediated mutagenesis. Such variant nucleotide sequences are alsoencompassed by the present invention.

For example, preferably conservative amino acid substitutions may bemade at one or more predicted, preferably nonessential amino acidresidues. A “nonessential” amino acid residue is a residue that can bealtered from the wild-type sequence of a delta-endotoxin protein withoutaltering the biological activity, whereas an “essential” amino acidresidue is required for biological activity. A “conservative amino acidsubstitution” is one in which the amino acid residue is replaced with anamino acid residue having a similar side chain. Families of amino acidresidues having similar side chains have been defined in the art. Thesefamilies include amino acids with basic side chains (e.g., lysine,arginine, histidine), acidic side chains (e.g., aspartic acid, glutamicacid), uncharged polar side chains (e.g., glycine, asparagine,glutamine, serine, threonine, tyrosine, cysteine), nonpolar side chains(e.g., alanine, valine, leucine, isoleucine, proline, phenylalanine,methionine, tryptophan), beta-branched side chains (e.g., threonine,valine, isoleucine) and aromatic side chains (e.g., tyrosine,phenylalanine, tryptophan, histidine).

There are generally five highly conserved regions among thedelta-endotoxin proteins, concentrated largely in the center of thedomain or at the junction between domains (Rajamohan et al. (1998) Prog.Nucleic Acid Res. Mol. Biol. 60:1-23). The blocks of conserved aminoacids for various delta-endotoxins as well as consensus sequences may befound in Schnepf et al. (1998) Microbio. Mol. Biol. Rev. 62:775-806 andLereclus et al. (1989) Role, Structure, and Molecular Organization ofthe Genes Coding for the Parasporal d-endotoxins of Bacillusthuringiensis. In Regulation of Procaryotic Development. Issar Smit,Slepecky, R. A., Setlow, P. American Society for Microbiology,Washington, D.C. 20006. It has been proposed that delta-endotoxinshaving these conserved regions may share a similar structure, consistingof three domains (Li et al. (1991) Nature 353: 815-821). Domain I hasthe highest similarity between delta-endotoxins (Bravo (1997) J.Bacteriol. 179:2793-2801).

Amino acid substitutions may be made in nonconserved regions that retainfunction. In general, such substitutions would not be made for conservedamino acid residues, or for amino acid residues residing within aconserved motif, where such residues are essential for protein activity.Examples of residues that are conserved and that may be essential forprotein activity include, for example, residues 103, 122, 124, 168, 170,180, 185-188, 190, 191, 196, 204, 205, 225, 257, 262, 287, 321, 496,518, 519, and 575 of SEQ ID NO:3. Examples of residues that areconserved but that may allow conservative amino acid substitutions andstill retain activity include, for example, residues 106, 109, 110, 125,132, 139, 152, 167, 172, 183, 194, 195, 199, 211, 233, 240, 260, 271,329, 332, 336, 480, 521, 587, 620, and 626 of SEQ ID NO:3. However, oneof skill in the art would understand that functional variants may haveminor conserved or nonconserved alterations in the conserved residues.

Alternatively, variant nucleotide sequences can be made by introducingmutations randomly along all or part of the coding sequence, such as bysaturation mutagenesis, and the resultant mutants can be screened forability to confer pesticidal activity to identify mutants that retainactivity. Following mutagenesis, the encoded protein can be expressedrecombinantly, and the activity of the protein can be determined usingstandard assay techniques.

Using methods such as PCR, hybridization, and the like correspondingdelta-endotoxin sequences can be identified, such sequences havingsubstantial identity to the sequences of the invention. See, forexample, Sambrook J., and Russell, D. W. (2001) Molecular Cloning: ALaboratory Manual. (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold SpringHarbor, N.Y.) and Innis, et al. (1990) PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methodsand Applications (Academic Press, NY).

In a hybridization method, all or part of a delta-endotoxin nucleotidesequence can be used to screen cDNA or genomic libraries. Methods forconstruction of such cDNA and genomic libraries are generally known inthe art and are disclosed in Sambrook and Russell, 2001. The so-calledhybridization probes may be genomic DNA fragments, cDNA fragments, RNAfragments, or other oligonucleotides, and may be labeled with adetectable group such as ³²P, or any other detectable marker, such asother radioisotopes, a fluorescent compound, an enzyme, or an enzymeco-factor. Probes for hybridization can be made by labeling syntheticoligonucleotides based on the known delta-endotoxin encoding nucleotidesequence disclosed herein. Degenerate primers designed on the basis ofconserved nucleotides or amino acid residues in the nucleotide sequenceor encoded amino acid sequence can additionally be used. The probetypically comprises a region of nucleotide sequence that hybridizesunder stringent conditions to at least about 12, preferably about 25,more preferably at least about 50, 75, 100, 125, 150, 175, 200, 250,300, 350, or 400 consecutive nucleotides of a delta-endotoxin-encodingnucleotide sequence of the invention or a fragment or variant thereof.Preparation of probes for hybridization is generally known in the artand is disclosed in Sambrook and Russell, 2001, herein incorporated byreference.

In hybridization techniques, all or part of a known nucleotide sequenceis used as a probe that selectively hybridizes to other correspondingnucleotide sequences present in a population of cloned genomic DNAfragments or cDNA fragments (i.e., genomic or cDNA libraries) from achosen organism. The hybridization probes may be genomic DNA fragments,cDNA fragments, RNA fragments, or other oligonucleotides, and may belabeled with a detectable group such as ³²P, or any other detectablemarker. Thus, for example, probes for hybridization can be made bylabeling synthetic oligonucleotides based on the delta-endotoxinsequence of the invention. Methods for preparation of probes forhybridization and for construction of cDNA and genomic libraries aregenerally known in the art and are disclosed in Sambrook et al. (1989)Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual (2d ed., Cold Spring HarborLaboratory Press, Plainview, N.Y.).

For example, an entire delta-endotoxin sequence disclosed herein, or oneor more portions thereof, may be used as a probe capable of specificallyhybridizing to corresponding delta-endotoxin-like sequences andmessenger RNAs. To achieve specific hybridization under a variety ofconditions, such probes include sequences that are unique and arepreferably at least about 10 nucleotides in length, and most preferablyat least about 20 nucleotides in length. Such probes may be used toamplify corresponding delta-endotoxin sequences from a chosen organismby PCR. This technique may be used to isolate additional codingsequences from a desired organism or as a diagnostic assay to determinethe presence of coding sequences in an organism. Hybridizationtechniques include hybridization screening of plated DNA libraries(either plaques or colonies; see, for example, Sambrook et al. (1989)Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual (2d ed., Cold Spring HarborLaboratory Press, Plainview, N.Y.).

Hybridization of such sequences may be carried out under stringentconditions. By “stringent conditions” or “stringent hybridizationconditions” is intended conditions under which a probe will hybridize toits target sequence to a detectably greater degree than to othersequences (e.g., at least 2-fold over background). Stringent conditionsare sequence-dependent and will be different in different circumstances.By controlling the stringency of the hybridization and/or washingconditions, target sequences that are 100% complementary to the probecan be identified (homologous probing). Alternatively, stringencyconditions can be adjusted to allow some mismatching in sequences sothat lower degrees of similarity are detected (heterologous probing).Generally, a probe is less than about 1000 nucleotides in length,preferably less than 500 nucleotides in length.

Typically, stringent conditions will be those in which the saltconcentration is less than about 1.5 M Na ion, typically about 0.01 to1.0 M Na ion concentration (or other salts) at pH 7.0 to 8.3 and thetemperature is at least about 30° C. for short probes (e.g., 10 to 50nucleotides) and at least about 60° C. for long probes (e.g., greaterthan 50 nucleotides). Stringent conditions may also be achieved with theaddition of destabilizing agents such as formamide. Exemplary lowstringency conditions include hybridization with a buffer solution of 30to 35% formamide, 1 M NaCl, 1% SDS (sodium dodecyl sulphate) at 37° C.,and a wash in 1× to 2×SSC (20×SSC=3.0 M NaCl/0.3 M trisodium citrate) at50 to 55° C. Exemplary moderate stringency conditions includehybridization in 40 to 45% formamide, 1.0 M NaCl, 1% SDS at 37° C., anda wash in 0.5× to 1×SSC at 55 to 60° C. Exemplary high stringencyconditions include hybridization in 50% formamide, 1 M NaCl, 1% SDS at37° C., and a wash in 0.1×SSC at 60 to 65° C. Optionally, wash buffersmay comprise about 0.1% to about 1% SDS. Duration of hybridization isgenerally less than about 24 hours, usually about 4 to about 12 hours.

Specificity is typically the function of post-hybridization washes, thecritical factors being the ionic strength and temperature of the finalwash solution. For DNA-DNA hybrids, the T_(m) can be approximated fromthe equation of Meinkoth and Wahl (1984) Anal. Biochem. 138:267-284:T_(m)=81.5° C.+16.6 (log M)+0.41 (% GC)−0.61 (% form)−500/L; where M isthe molarity of monovalent cations, % GC is the percentage of guanosineand cytosine nucleotides in the DNA, % form is the percentage offormamide in the hybridization solution, and L is the length of thehybrid in base pairs. The T_(m) is the temperature (under defined ionicstrength and pH) at which 50% of a complementary target sequencehybridizes to a perfectly matched probe. T_(m) is reduced by about 1° C.for each 1% of mismatching; thus, T_(m), hybridization, and/or washconditions can be adjusted to hybridize to sequences of the desiredidentity. For example, if sequences with ≧90% identity are sought, theT_(m) can be decreased 10° C. Generally, stringent conditions areselected to be about 5° C. lower than the thermal melting point (T_(m))for the specific sequence and its complement at a defined ionic strengthand pH. However, severely stringent conditions can utilize ahybridization and/or wash at 1, 2, 3, or 4° C. lower than the thermalmelting point (T_(m)); moderately stringent conditions can utilize ahybridization and/or wash at 6, 7, 8, 9, or 10° C. lower than thethermal melting point (T_(m)); low stringency conditions can utilize ahybridization and/or wash at 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, or 20° C. lower thanthe thermal melting point (T_(m)). Using the equation, hybridization andwash compositions, and desired T_(m), those of ordinary skill willunderstand that variations in the stringency of hybridization and/orwash solutions are inherently described. If the desired degree ofmismatching results in a T_(m) of less than 45° C. (aqueous solution) or32° C. (formamide solution), it is preferred to increase the SSCconcentration so that a higher temperature can be used. An extensiveguide to the hybridization of nucleic acids is found in Tijssen (1993)Laboratory Techniques in Biochemistry and MolecularBiology—Hybridization with Nucleic Acid Probes, Part I, Chapter 2(Elsevier, New York); and Ausubel et al, eds. (1995) Current Protocolsin Molecular Biology, Chapter 2 (Greene Publishing andWiley-Interscience, New York). See Sambrook et al. (1989) MolecularCloning: A Laboratory Manual (2d ed., Cold Spring Harbor LaboratoryPress, Plainview, N.Y.).

Isolated Proteins and Variants and Fragments thereof

Delta-endotoxin proteins are also encompassed within the presentinvention. By “delta-endotoxin protein” is intended a protein having theamino acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO:3 or 5. Fragments,biologically active portions, and variants thereof are also provided,and may be used to practice the methods of the present invention.

“Fragments” or “biologically active portions” include polypeptidefragments comprising a portion of an amino acid sequence encoding adelta-endotoxin protein as set forth in SEQ ID NO:3 or 5 and thatretains pesticidal activity. A biologically active portion of adelta-endotoxin protein can be a polypeptide that is, for example, 10,25, 50, 100 or more amino acids in length. Such biologically activeportions can be prepared by recombinant techniques and evaluated forpesticidal activity. Methods for measuring pesticidal activity are wellknown in the art. See, for example, Czapla and Lang (1990) J. Econ.Entomol. 83(6): 2480-2485; Andrews et al. (1988) Biochem. J.252:199-206; Marrone et al. (1985) J. of Economic Entomology 78:290-293;and U.S. Pat. No. 5,743,477, all of which are herein incorporated byreference in their entirety. As used here, a fragment comprises at least8 contiguous amino acids of SEQ ID NO:3 or 5. The invention encompassesother fragments, however, such as any fragment in the protein greaterthan about 10, 20, 30, 50, 100, 150, 200, 250, 300, 350, 400, 450, 500,550, and 600 amino acids.

By “variants” is intended proteins or polypeptides having an amino acidsequence that is at least about 60%, 65%, preferably about 70%, 75%,more preferably about 80%, 85%, most preferably about 90%, 91%, 92%,93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98% or 99% identical to the amino acid sequenceof SEQ ID NO:3 or 5. Variants also include polypeptides encoded by anucleic acid molecule that hybridizes to the nucleic acid molecule ofSEQ ID NO:1, 2, or 4, or a complement thereof, under stringentconditions. Such variants generally retain pesticidal activity. Variantsinclude polypeptides that differ in amino acid sequence due tomutagenesis. Variant proteins encompassed by the present invention arebiologically active, that is they continue to possess the desiredbiological activity of the native protein, that is, retaining pesticidalactivity. Methods for measuring pesticidal activity are well known inthe art. See, for example, Czapla and Lang (1990) J. Econ. Entomol.83(6): 2480-2485; Andrews et al. (1988) Biochem. J. 252:199-206; Marroneet al. (1985) J. of Economic Entomology 78:290-293; and U.S. Pat. No.5,743,477, all of which are herein incorporated by reference in theirentirety.

Altered or Improved Variants

It is recognized that DNA sequences of a delta-endotoxin may be alteredby various methods, and that these alterations may result in DNAsequences encoding proteins with amino acid sequences different thanthat encoded by the delta-endotoxin of the present invention. Thisprotein may be altered in various ways including amino acidsubstitutions, deletions, truncations, and insertions. Methods for suchmanipulations are generally known in the art. For example, amino acidsequence variants of the delta-endotoxin protein can be prepared bymutations in the DNA. This may also be accomplished by one of severalforms of mutagenesis and/or in directed evolution. In some aspects, thechanges encoded in the amino acid sequence will not substantially affectthe function of the protein. Such variants will possess the desiredpesticidal activity. However, it is understood that the ability ofdelta-endotoxin to confer pesticidal activity may be improved by the useof such techniques upon the compositions of this invention. For example,one may express delta-endotoxin in host cells that exhibit high rates ofbase misincorporation during DNA replication, such as XL-1 Red(Stratagene). After propagation in such strains, one can isolate thedelta-endotoxin DNA (for example by preparing plasmid DNA, or byamplifying by PCR and cloning the resulting PCR fragment into a vector),culture the delta-endotoxin mutations in a non-mutagenic strain, andidentify mutated delta-endotoxin genes with pesticidal activity, forexample by performing an assay to test for pesticidal activity.Generally, the protein is mixed and used in feeding assays. See, forexample Marrone et al. (1985) J. of Economic Entomology 78:290-293. Suchassays can include contacting plants with one or more pests anddetermining the plant's ability to survive and/or cause the death of thepests. Examples of mutations that result in increased toxicity are foundin Schnepf et al. (1998) Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 62:775-806.

Alternatively, alterations may be made to the protein sequence of manyproteins at the amino or carboxy terminus without substantiallyaffecting activity. This can include insertions, deletions, oralterations introduced by modern molecular methods, such as PCR,including PCR amplifications that alter or extend the protein codingsequence by virtue of inclusion of amino acid encoding sequences in theoligonucleotides utilized in the PCR amplification. Alternatively, theprotein sequences added can include entire protein-coding sequences,such as those used commonly in the art to generate protein fusions. Suchfusion proteins are often used to (1) increase expression of a proteinof interest (2) introduce a binding domain, enzymatic activity, orepitope to facilitate either protein purification, protein detection, orother experimental uses known in the art (3) target secretion ortranslation of a protein to a subcellular organelle, such as theperiplasmic space of Gram-negative bacteria, or the endoplasmicreticulum of eukaryotic cells, the latter of which often results inglycosylation of the protein.

Variant nucleotide and amino acid sequences of the present inventionalso encompass sequences derived from mutagenic and recombinogenicprocedures such as DNA shuffling. With such a procedure, one or moredifferent delta-endotoxin protein coding regions can be used to create anew delta-endotoxin protein possessing the desired properties. In thismanner, libraries of recombinant polynucleotides are generated from apopulation of related sequence polynucleotides comprising sequenceregions that have substantial sequence identity and can be homologouslyrecombined in vitro or in vivo. For example, using this approach,sequence motifs encoding a domain of interest may be shuffled betweenthe delta-endotoxin gene of the invention and other knowndelta-endotoxin genes to obtain a new gene coding for a protein with animproved property of interest, such as an increased insecticidalactivity. Strategies for such DNA shuffling are known in the art. See,for example, Stemmer (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:10747-10751;Stemmer (1994) Nature 370:389-391; Crameri et al. (1997) Nature Biotech.15:436-438; Moore et al. (1997) J. Mol. Biol. 272:336-347; Zhang et al.(1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:4504-4509; Crameri et al. (1998)Nature 391:288-291; and U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,605,793 and 5,837,458.

Domain swapping or shuffling is another mechanism for generating altereddelta-endotoxin proteins. Domains II and III may be swapped betweendelta-endotoxin proteins, resulting in hybrid or chimeric toxins withimproved pesticidal activity or target spectrum. Methods for generatingrecombinant proteins and testing them for pesticidal activity are wellknown in the art (see, for example, Naimov et al. (2001) Appl. Environ.Microbiol. 67:5328-5330; de Maagd et al. (1996) Appl. Environ.Microbiol. 62:1537-1543; Ge et al. (1991) J. Biol. Chem.266:17954-17958; Schnepf et al. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265:20923-20930;Rang et al. 91999) Appl. Environ. Micriobiol. 65:2918-2925).

Plant Transformation

Transformation of plant cells can be accomplished by one of severaltechniques known in the art. First, one engineers the delta-endotoxingene in a way that allows its expression in plant cells. Typically aconstruct that expresses such a protein would contain a promoter todrive transcription of the gene, as well as a 3′ untranslated region toallow transcription termination and polyadenylation. The organization ofsuch constructs is well known in the art. In some instances, it may beuseful to engineer the gene such that the resulting peptide is secreted,or otherwise targeted within the plant cell. For example, the gene canbe engineered to contain a signal peptide to facilitate transfer of thepeptide to the endoplasmic reticulum. It may also be preferable toengineer the plant expression cassette to contain an intron, such thatmRNA processing of the intron is required for expression.

Typically this ‘plant expression cassette’ will be inserted into a‘plant transformation vector’. This plant transformation vector may becomprised of one or more DNA vectors needed for achieving planttransformation. For example, it is a common practice in the art toutilize plant transformation vectors that are comprised of more than onecontiguous DNA segment. These vectors are often referred to in the artas ‘binary vectors’. Binary vectors as well as vectors with helperplasmids are most often used for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation,where the size and complexity of DNA segments needed to achieveefficient transformation is quite large, and it is advantageous toseparate functions onto separate DNA molecules. Binary vectors typicallycontain a plasmid vector that contains the cis-acting sequences requiredfor T-DNA transfer (such as left border and right border), a selectablemarker that is engineered to be capable of expression in a plant cell,and a ‘gene of interest’ (a gene engineered to be capable of expressionin a plant cell for which generation of transgenic plants is desired).Also present on this plasmid vector are sequences required for bacterialreplication. The cis-acting sequences are arranged in a fashion to allowefficient transfer into plant cells and expression therein. For example,the selectable marker gene and the gene of interest are located betweenthe left and right borders. Often a second plasmid vector contains thetrans-acting factors that mediate T-DNA transfer from Agrobacterium toplant cells. This plasmid often contains the virulence functions (Virgenes) that allow infection of plant cells by Agrobacterium, andtransfer of DNA by cleavage at border sequences and vir-mediated DNAtransfer, as in understood in the art (Hellens and Mullineaux (2000)Trends in Plant Science, 5:446-451). Several types of Agrobacteriumstrains (e.g. LBA4404, GV3101, EHA101, EHA105, etc.) can be used forplant transformation. The second plasmid vector is not necessary fortransforming the plants by other methods such as microprojection,microinjection, electroporation, polyethelene glycol, etc.

In general, plant transformation methods involve transferringheterologous DNA into target plant cells (e.g. immature or matureembryos, suspension cultures, undifferentiated callus, protoplasts,etc.), followed by applying a maximum threshold level of appropriateselection (depending on the selectable marker gene) to recover thetransformed plant cells from a group of untransformed cell mass.Explants are typically transferred to a fresh supply of the same mediumand cultured routinely. Subsequently, the transformed cells aredifferentiated into shoots after placing on regeneration mediumsupplemented with a maximum threshold level of selecting agent. Theshoots are then transferred to a selective rooting medium for recoveringrooted shoot or plantlet. The transgenic plantlet then grows into amature plant and produces fertile seeds (e.g. Hiei et al. (1994) ThePlant Journal 6: 271-282; Ishida et al. (1996) Nature Biotechnology 14:745-750). Explants are typically transferred to a fresh supply of thesame medium and cultured routinely. A general description of thetechniques and methods for generating transgenic plantlets are found inAyres and Park, 1994 (Critical Reviews in Plant Science 13:219-239) andBommineni and Jauhar, 1997 (Maydica 42:107-120). Since the transformedmaterial contains many cells; both transformed and non-transformed cellsare present in any piece of subjected target callus or tissue or groupof cells. The ability to kill non-transformed cells and allowtransformed cells to proliferate results in transformed plant cultures.Often, the ability to remove non-transformed cells is a limitation torapid recovery of transformed plant cells and successful generation oftransgenic plants.

Generation of transgenic plants may be performed by one of severalmethods, including but not limited to introduction of heterologous DNAby Agrobacterium into plant cells (Agrobacterium-mediatedtransformation), bombardment of plant cells with heterologous foreignDNA adhered to particles, and various other non-particle direct-mediatedmethods (e.g. Hiei et al. (1994) The Plant Journal 6:271-282; Ishida etal. (1996) Nature Biotechnology 14:745-750; Ayres and Park (1994)Critical Reviews in Plant Science 13:219-239; Bommineni and Jauhar(1997) Maydica 42:107-120) to transfer DNA.

Transformation protocols as well as protocols for introducing nucleotidesequences into plants may vary depending on the type of plant or plantcell, i.e., monocot or dicot, targeted for transformation. Suitablemethods of introducing nucleotide sequences into plant cells andsubsequent insertion into the plant genome include microinjection(Crossway et al. (1986) Biotechniques 4:320-334), electroporation (Riggset al. (1986) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83:5602-5606,Agrobacterium-mediated transformation (U.S. Pat. No. 5,563,055; U.S.Pat. No. 5,981,840), direct gene transfer (Paszkowski et al. (1984) EMBOJ. 3:2717-2722), and ballistic particle acceleration (see, for example,U.S. Pat. No. 4,945,050; U.S. Pat. No. 5,879,918; U.S. Pat. No.5,886,244; U.S. Pat. No. 5,932,782; Tomes et al. (1995) “Direct DNATransfer into Intact Plant Cells via Microprojectile Bombardment,” inPlant Cell, Tissue, and Organ Culture: Fundamental Methods, ed. Gamborgand Phillips (Springer-Verlag, Berlin); McCabe et al. (1988)Biotechnology 6:923-926); aerosol beam transformation (U.S. PublishedApplication No. 20010026941; U.S. Pat. No. 4,945,050; InternationalPublication No. WO 91/00915; U.S. Published Application No. 2002015066);and Lec1 transformation (WO 00/28058). Also see, Weissinger et al.(1988) Ann. Rev. Genet. 22:421-477; Sanford et al. (1987) ParticulateScience and Technology 5:27-37; Christou et al. (1988) Plant Physiol.87:671-674; McCabe et al. (1988) Bio/Technology 6:923-926; Finer andMcMullen (1991) In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol. 27P:175-182; Singh et al.(1998) Theor. Appl. Genet. 96:319-324; Datta et al. (1990) Biotechnology8:736-740; Klein et al. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85:4305-4309;U.S. Pat. No. 5,240,855; U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,322,783 and 5,324,646; Tomeset al. (1995) “Direct DNA Transfer into Intact Plant Cells viaMicroprojectile Bombardment,” in Plant Cell, Tissue, and Organ Culture:Fundamental Methods, ed. Gamborg (Springer-Verlag, Berlin); Klein et al.(1988) Plant Physiol. 91:440-444; Hooykaas-Van Slogteren et al. (1984)Nature (London) 311:763-764; U.S. Pat. No. 5,736,369; Bytebier et al.(1987) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84:5345-5349 (Liliaceae); De Wet etal. (1985) in The Experimental Manipulation of Ovule Tissues, ed.Chapman et al. (Longman, New York), pp. 197-209; Kaeppler et al. (1990)Plant Cell Reports 9:415-418 and Kaeppler et al. (1992) Theor. Appl.Genet. 84:560-566; D'Halluin et al. (1992) Plant Cell 4:1495-1505; Li etal. (1993) Plant Cell Reports 12:250-255 and Christou and Ford (1995)Annals of Botany 75:407-413 (rice); Osjoda et al. (1996) NatureBiotechnology 14:745-750; all of which are herein incorporated byreference.

Following integration of heterologous foreign DNA into plant cells, onethen applies a maximum threshold level of appropriate selection in themedium to kill the untransformed cells and separate and proliferate theputatively transformed cells that survive from this selection treatmentby transferring regularly to a fresh medium. By continuous passage andchallenge with appropriate selection, one identifies and proliferatesthe cells that are transformed with the plasmid vector. Then molecularand biochemical methods will be used for confirming the presence of theintegrated heterologous gene of interest in the genome of transgenicplant.

The cells that have been transformed may be grown into plants inaccordance with conventional ways. See, for example, McCormick et al.(1986) Plant Cell Reports 5:81-84. These plants may then be grown, andeither pollinated with the same transformed strain or different strains,and the resulting hybrid having constitutive expression of the desiredphenotypic characteristic identified. Two or more generations may begrown to ensure that expression of the desired phenotypic characteristicis stably maintained and inherited and then seeds harvested to ensureexpression of the desired phenotypic characteristic has been achieved.In this manner, the present invention provides transformed seed (alsoreferred to as “transgenic seed”) having a nucleotide construct of theinvention, for example, an expression cassette of the invention, stablyincorporated into their genome.

The delta-endotoxin sequences of the invention may be provided inexpression cassettes for expression in the plant of interest. Thecassette will include 5′ and 3′ regulatory sequences operably linked toa sequence of the invention. By “operably linked” is intended afunctional linkage between a promoter and a second sequence, wherein thepromoter sequence initiates and mediates transcription of the DNAsequence corresponding to the second sequence. Generally, operablylinked means that the nucleic acid sequences being linked are contiguousand, where necessary to join two protein coding regions, contiguous andin the same reading frame. The cassette may additionally contain atleast one additional gene to be cotransformed into the organism.Alternatively, the additional gene(s) can be provided on multipleexpression cassettes.

Such an expression cassette is provided with a plurality of restrictionsites for insertion of the delta-endotoxin sequence to be under thetranscriptional regulation of the regulatory regions.

The expression cassette will include in the 5′-3′ direction oftranscription, a transcriptional and translational initiation region(i.e., a promoter), a DNA sequence of the invention, and atranscriptional and translational termination region (i.e., terminationregion) functional in plants. The promoter may be native or analogous,or foreign or heterologous, to the plant host and/or to the DNA sequenceof the invention. Additionally, the promoter may be the natural sequenceor alternatively a synthetic sequence. Where the promoter is “native” or“homologous” to the plant host, it is intended that the promoter isfound in the native plant into which the promoter is introduced. Wherethe promoter is “foreign” or “heterologous” to the DNA sequence of theinvention, it is intended that the promoter is not the native ornaturally occurring promoter for the operably linked DNA sequence of theinvention.

The termination region may be native with the transcriptional initiationregion, may be native with the operably-linked DNA sequence of interest,may be native with the plant host, or may be derived from another source(i.e., foreign or heterologous to the promoter, the DNA sequence ofinterest, the plant host, or any combination thereof). Convenienttermination regions are available from the Ti-plasmid of A. tumefaciens,such as the octopine synthase and nopaline synthase termination regions.See also Guerineau et al. (1991) Mol. Gen. Genet. 262:141-144; Proudfoot(1991) Cell 64:671-674; Sanfacon et al. (1991) Genes Dev. 5:141-149;Mogen et al. (1990) Plant Cell 2:1261-1272; Munroe et al. (1990) Gene91:151-158; Ballas et al. (1989) Nucleic Acids Res. 17:7891-7903; andJoshi et al. (1987) Nucleic Acid Res. 15:9627-9639.

Where appropriate, the gene(s) may be optimized for increased expressionin the transformed host cell. That is, the genes can be synthesizedusing host cell-preferred codons for improved expression, or may besynthesized using codons at a host-preferred codon usage frequency.Generally, the GC content of the gene will be increased. See, forexample, Campbell and Gowri (1990) Plant Physiol. 92: 1-11 for adiscussion of host-preferred codon usage. Methods are known in the artfor synthesizing host-preferred genes. See, for example, U.S. Pat. Nos.6,320,100; 6,075,185; 5,380,831; and 5,436,391, U.S. PublishedApplication Nos. 20040005600 and 20010003849, and Murray et al. (1989)Nucleic Acids Res. 17:477-498, herein incorporated by reference.

In one embodiment, the nucleic acids of interest are targeted to thechloroplast for expression. In this manner, where the nucleic acid ofinterest is not directly inserted into the chloroplast, the expressioncassette will additionally contain a nucleic acid encoding a transitpeptide to direct the gene product of interest to the chloroplasts. Suchtransit peptides are known in the art. See, for example, Von Heijne etal. (1991) Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 9:104-126; Clark et al. (1989) J. Biol.Chem. 264:17544-17550; Della-Cioppa et al. (1987) Plant Physiol.84:965-968; Romer et al. (1993) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.196:1414-1421; and Shah et al. (1986) Science 233:478-481.

Methods for transformation of chloroplasts are known in the art. See,for example, Svab et al. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87:8526-8530;Svab and Maliga (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:913-917; Svab andMaliga (1993) EMBO J. 12:601-606. The method relies on particle gundelivery of DNA containing a selectable marker and targeting of the DNAto the plastid genome through homologous recombination. Additionally,plastid transformation can be accomplished by transactivation of asilent plastid-borne transgene by tissue-preferred expression of anuclear-encoded and plastid-directed RNA polymerase. Such a system hasbeen reported in McBride et al. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA91:7301-7305.

The nucleic acids of interest to be targeted to the chloroplast may beoptimized for expression in the chloroplast to account for differencesin codon usage between the plant nucleus and this organelle. In thismanner, the nucleic acids of interest may be synthesized usingchloroplast-preferred codons. See, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,380,831,herein incorporated by reference.

Evaluation of Plant Transformation

Following introduction of heterologous foreign DNA into plant cells, thetransformation or integration of heterologous gene in the plant genomeis confirmed by various methods such as analysis of nucleic acids,proteins and metabolites associated with the integrated gene.

PCR Analysis: PCR analysis is a rapid method to screen transformedcells, tissue or shoots for the presence of incorporated gene at theearlier stage before transplanting into the soil (Sambrook and Russell,2001) PCR is carried out using oligonucleotide primers specific to thegene of interest or Agrobacterium vector background, etc.

Southern Analysis Plant transformation is confirmed by Southern blotanalysis of genomic DNA (Sambrook and Russell, 2001). In general, totalDNA is extracted from the transformant, digested with appropriaterestriction enzymes, fractionated in an agarose gel and transferred to anitrocellulose or nylon membrane. The membrane or “blot” then is probedwith, for example, radiolabeled ³²P target DNA fragment to confirm theintegration of introduced gene in the plant genome according to standardtechniques (Sambrook and Russell, 2001. Molecular Cloning: A LaboratoryManual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.).

Northern Analysis: RNA is isolated from specific tissues oftransformant, fractionated in a formaldehyde agarose gel, blotted onto anylon filter according to standard procedures that are routinely used inthe art (Sambrook, J., and Russell, D. W. 2001. Molecular Cloning: ALaboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold SpringHarbor, N.Y.). Expression of RNA encoded by the delta-endotoxin is thentested by hybridizing the filter to a radioactive probe derived from adelta-endotoxin, by methods known in the art (Sambrook and Russell,2001)

Western blot and Biochemical assays: Western blot and biochemical assaysand the like may be carried out on the transgenic plants to confirm thedetermine the presence of protein encoded by the delta-endotoxin gene bystandard procedures (Sambrook, J., and Russell, D. W. 2001. MolecularCloning: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, ColdSpring Harbor, N.Y.) using antibodies that bind to one or more epitopespresent on the delta-endotoxin protein.

Pesticidal Activity in Plants

In another aspect of the invention, one may generate transgenic plantsexpressing delta-endotoxin that have pesticidal activity. Methodsdescribed above by way of example may be utilized to generate transgenicplants, but the manner in which the transgenic plant cells are generatedis not critical to this invention. Methods known or described in the artsuch as Agrobacterium-mediated transformation, aerosol beam, biolistictransformation, and non-particle-mediated methods may be used at thediscretion of the experimenter. Plants expressing delta-endotoxin may beisolated by common methods described in the art, for example bytransformation of callus, selection of transformed callus, andregeneration of fertile plants from such transgenic callus. In suchprocess, one may use any gene as a selectable marker so long as itsexpression in plant cells confers ability to identify or select fortransformed cells.

A number of markers have been developed for use with plant cells, suchas resistance to chloramphenicol, the aminoglycoside G418, hygromycin,or the like. Other genes that encode a product involved in chloroplastmetabolism may also be used as selectable markers. For example, genesthat provide resistance to plant herbicides such as glyphosate,bromoxynil, or imidazolinone may find particular use. Such genes havebeen reported (Stalker et al. (1985) J. Biol. Chem. 263:6310-6314(bromoxynil resistance nitrilase gene); and Sathasivan et al. (1990)Nucl. Acids Res. 18:2188 (AHAS imidazolinone resistance gene).

Fertile plants expressing delta-endotoxin may be tested for pesticidalactivity, and the plants showing optimal activity selected for furtherbreeding. Methods are available in the art to assay for pest activity.Generally, the protein is mixed and used in feeding assays. See, forexample Marrone et al. (1985) J. of Economic Entomology 78:290-293.

Use in Pesticidal Control

General methods for employing the strains of the invention in pesticidecontrol or in engineering other organisms as pesticidal agents are knownin the art. See, for example U.S. Pat. No. 5,039,523 and EP 0480762A2.

The Bacillus strains of the invention or the microorganisms that havebeen genetically altered to contain the pesticidal gene and protein maybe used for protecting agricultural crops and products from pests. Inone aspect of the invention, whole, i.e., unlysed, cells of a toxin(pesticide)-producing organism are treated with reagents that prolongthe activity of the toxin produced in the cell when the cell is appliedto the environment of target pest(s).

Alternatively, the pesticide is produced by introducing a heterologousgene into a cellular host. Expression of the heterologous gene results,directly or indirectly, in the intracellular production and maintenanceof the pesticide. In one aspect of this invention, these cells are thentreated under conditions that prolong the activity of the toxin producedin the cell when the cell is applied to the environment of targetpest(s). The resulting product retains the toxicity of the toxin. Thesenaturally encapsulated pesticides may then be formulated in accordancewith conventional techniques for application to the environment hostinga target pest, e.g., soil, water, and foliage of plants. See, forexample EPA 0192319, and the references cited therein. Alternatively,one may formulate the cells expressing the genes of this invention suchas to allow application of the resulting material as a pesticide.

The active ingredients of the present invention are normally applied inthe form of compositions and can be applied to the crop area or plant tobe treated, simultaneously or in succession, with other compounds. Thesecompounds can be fertilizers, weed killers, cryoprotectants,surfactants, detergents, pesticidal soaps, dormant oils, polymers,and/or time-release or biodegradable carrier formulations that permitlong-term dosing of a target area following a single application of theformulation. They can also be selective herbicides, chemicalinsecticides, virucides, microbicides, amoebicides, pesticides,fungicides, bacteriocides, nematocides, mollusocides or mixtures ofseveral of these preparations, if desired, together with furtheragriculturally acceptable carriers, surfactants or application-promotingadjuvants customarily employed in the art of formulation. Suitablecarriers and adjuvants can be solid or liquid and correspond to thesubstances ordinarily employed in formulation technology, e.g. naturalor regenerated mineral substances, solvents, dispersants, wettingagents, tackifiers, binders or fertilizers. Likewise the formulationsmay be prepared into edible “baits” or fashioned into pest “traps” topermit feeding or ingestion by a target pest of the pesticidalformulation.

Preferred methods of applying an active ingredient of the presentinvention or an agrochemical composition of the present invention whichcontains at least one of the pesticidal proteins produced by thebacterial strains of the present invention are leaf application, seedcoating and soil application. The number of applications and the rate ofapplication depend on the intensity of infestation by the correspondingpest.

The composition may be formulated as a powder, dust, pellet, granule,spray, emulsion, colloid, solution, or such like, and may be preparableby such conventional means as desiccation, lyophilization, homogenation,extraction, filtration, centrifugation, sedimentation, or concentrationof a culture of cells comprising the polypeptide. In all suchcompositions that contain at least one such pesticidal polypeptide, thepolypeptide may be present in a concentration of from about 1% to about99% by weight.

Lepidopteran or coleopteran pests may be killed or reduced in numbers ina given area by the methods of the invention, or may be prophylacticallyapplied to an environmental area to prevent infestation by a susceptiblepest. Preferably the pest ingests, or is contacted with, apesticidally-effective amount of the polypeptide. By“pesticidally-effective amount” is intended an amount of the pesticidethat is able to bring about death to at least one pest, or to noticeablyreduce pest growth, feeding, or normal physiological development. Thisamount will vary depending on such factors as, for example, the specifictarget pests to be controlled, the specific environment, location,plant, crop, or agricultural site to be treated, the environmentalconditions, and the method, rate, concentration, stability, and quantityof application of the pesticidally-effective polypeptide composition.The formulations may also vary with respect to climatic conditions,environmental considerations, and/or frequency of application and/orseverity of pest infestation.

The pesticide compositions described may be made by formulating eitherthe bacterial cell, crystal and/or spore suspension, or isolated proteincomponent with the desired agriculturally-acceptable carrier. Thecompositions may be formulated prior to administration in an appropriatemeans such as lyophilized, freeze-dried, desiccated, or in an aqueouscarrier, medium or suitable diluent, such as saline or other buffer. Theformulated compositions may be in the form of a dust or granularmaterial, or a suspension in oil (vegetable or mineral), or water oroil/water emulsions, or as a wettable powder, or in combination with anyother carrier material suitable for agricultural application. Suitableagricultural carriers can be solid or liquid and are well known in theart. The term “agriculturally-acceptable carrier” covers all adjuvants,inert components, dispersants, surfactants, tackifiers, binders, etc.that are ordinarily used in pesticide formulation technology; these arewell known to those skilled in pesticide formulation. The formulationsmay be mixed with one or more solid or liquid adjuvants and prepared byvarious means, e.g., by homogeneously mixing, blending and/or grindingthe pesticidal composition with suitable adjuvants using conventionalformulation techniques. Suitable formulations and application methodsare described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,468,523, herein incorporated byreference.

“Pest” includes but is not limited to, insects, fungi, bacteria,nematodes, mites, ticks, and the like. Insect pests include insectsselected from the orders Coleoptera, Diptera, Hymenoptera, Lepidoptera,Mallophaga, Homoptera, Hemiptera, Orthroptera, Thysanoptera, Dermaptera,Isoptera, Anoplura, Siphonaptera, Trichoptera, etc., particularlyColeoptera, Lepidoptera, and Diptera.

Insect pests include insects selected from the orders Coleoptera,Diptera, Hymenoptera, Lepidoptera, Mallophaga, Homoptera, Hemiptera,Orthoptera, Thysanoptera, Dermaptera, Isoptera, Anoplura, Siphonaptera,Trichoptera, etc., particularly Coleoptera and Lepidoptera. Insect pestsof the invention for the major crops include: Maize: Ostrinia nubilalis,European corn borer; Agrotis ipsilon, black cutworm; Helicoverpa zea,corn earworm; Spodoptera frugiperda, fall armyworm; Diatraeagrandiosella, southwestern corn borer; Elasmopalpus lignosellus, lessercornstalk borer; Diatraea saccharalis, surgarcane borer; Diabroticavirgifera, western corn rootworm; Diabrotica longicornis barberi,northern corn rootworm; Diabrotica undecimpunctata howardi, southerncorn rootworm; Melanotus spp., wireworms; Cyclocephala borealis,northern masked chafer (white grub); Cyclocephala immaculata, southernmasked chafer (white grub); Popillia japonica, Japanese beetle;Chaetocnema pulicaria, corn flea beetle; Sphenophorus maidis, maizebillbug; Rhopalosiphum maidis, corn leaf aphid; Anuraphis maidiradicis,corn root aphid; Blissus leucopterus leucopterus, chinch bug; Melanoplusfemurrubrum, redlegged grasshopper; Melanoplus sanguinipes, migratorygrasshopper; Hylemya platura, seedcorn maggot; Agromyza parvicornis,corn blot leafminer; Anaphothrips obscrurus, grass thrips; Solenopsismilesta, thief ant; Tetranychus urticae, twospotted spider mite;Sorghum: Chilo partellus, sorghum borer; Spodoptera frugiperda, fallarmyworm; Helicoverpa zea, corn earworm; Elasmopalpus lignosellus,lesser cornstalk borer; Feltia subterranea, granulate cutworm;Phyllophaga crinita, white grub; Eleodes, Conoderus, and Aeolus spp.,wireworms; Oulema melanopus, cereal leaf beetle; Chaetocnema pulicaria,corn flea beetle; Sphenophorus maidis, maize billbug; Rhopalosiphummaidis; corn leaf aphid; Sipha flava, yellow sugarcane aphid; Blissusleucopterus leucopterus, chinch bug; Contarinia sorghicola, sorghummidge; Tetranychus cinnabarinus, carmine spider mite; Tetranychusurticae, twospotted spider mite; Wheat: Pseudaletia unipunctata, armyworm; Spodoptera frugiperda, fall armyworm; Elasmopalpus lignosellus,lesser cornstalk borer; Agrotis orthogonia, western cutworm;Elasmopalpus lignosellus, lesser cornstalk borer; Oulema melanopus,cereal leaf beetle; Hypera punctata, clover leaf weevil; Diabroticaundecimpunctata howardi, southern corn rootworm; Russian wheat aphid;Schizaphis graminum, greenbug; Macrosiphum avenae, English grain aphid;Melanoplus femurrubrum, redlegged grasshopper; Melanoplusdifferentialis, differential grasshopper; Melanoplus sanguinipes,migratory grasshopper; Mayetiola destructor, Hessian fly; Sitodiplosismosellana, wheat midge; Meromyza americana, wheat stem maggot; Hylemyacoarctata, wheat bulb fly; Frankliniella fusca, tobacco thrips; Cephuscinctus, wheat stem sawfly; Aceria tulipae, wheat curl mite; Sunflower:Suleima helianthana, sunflower bud moth; Homoeosoma electellum,sunflower moth; zygogramma exclamationis, sunflower beetle; Bothyrusgibbosus, carrot beetle; Neolasioptera murtfeldtiana, sunflower seedmidge; Cotton: Heliothis virescens, cotton budworm; Helicoverpa zea,cotton bollworm; Spodoptera exigua, beet armyworm; Pectinophoragossypiella, pink bollworm; Anthonomus grandis, boll weevil; Aphisgossypii, cotton aphid; Pseudatomoscelis seriatus, cotton fleahopper;Trialeurodes abutilonea, bandedwinged whitefly; Lygus lineolaris,tarnished plant bug; Melanoplus femurrubrum, redlegged grasshopper;Melanoplus differentialis, differential grasshopper; Thrips tabaci,onion thrips; Franklinkiella fusca, tobacco thrips; Tetranychuscinnabarinus, carmine spider mite; Tetranychus urticae, twospottedspider mite; Rice: Diatraea saccharalis, sugarcane borer; Spodopterafrugiperda, fall armyworm; Helicoverpa zea, corn earworm; Colaspisbrunnea, grape colaspis; Lissorhoptrus oryzophilus, rice water weevil;Sitophilus oryzae, rice weevil; Nephotettix nigropictus, riceleafhopper; Blissus leucopterus leucopterus, chinch bug; Acrosternumhilare, green stink bug; Soybean: Pseudoplusia includens, soybeanlooper; Anticarsia gemmatalis, velvetbean caterpillar; Plathypenascabra, green cloverworm; Ostrinia nubilalis, European corn borer;Agrotis ipsilon, black cutworm; Spodoptera exigua, beet armyworm;Heliothis virescens, cotton budworm; Helicoverpa zea, cotton bollworm;Epilachna varivestis, Mexican bean beetle; Myzus persicae, green peachaphid; Empoasca fabae, potato leafhopper; Acrosternum hilare, greenstink bug; Melanoplus femurrubrum, redlegged grasshopper; Melanoplusdifferentialis, differential grasshopper; Hylemya platura, seedcornmaggot; Sericothrips variabilis, soybean thrips; Thrips tabaci, onionthrips; Tetranychus turkestani, strawberry spider mite; Tetranychusurticae, twospotted spider mite; Barley: Ostrinia nubilalis, Europeancorn borer; Agrotis ipsilon, black cutworm; Schizaphis graminum,greenbug; Blissus leucopterus leucopterus, chinch bug; Acrosternumhilare, green stink bug; Euschistus servus, brown stink bug; Deliaplatura, seedcorn maggot; Mayetiola destructor, Hessian fly; Petrobialatens, brown wheat mite; Oil Seed Rape: Brevicoryne brassicae, cabbageaphid; Phyllotreta cruciferae, Flea beetle; Mamestra configurata, Berthaarmyworm; Plutella xylostella, Diamond-back moth; Delia ssp., Rootmaggots.

Nematodes include parasitic nematodes such as root-knot, cyst, andlesion nematodes, including Heterodera spp., Meloidogyne spp., andGlobodera spp.; particularly members of the cyst nematodes, including,but not limited to, Heterodera glycines (soybean cyst nematode);Heterodera schachtii (beet cyst nematode); Heterodera avenae (cerealcyst nematode); and Globodera rostochiensis and Globodera pailida(potato cyst nematodes). Lesion nematodes include Pratylenchus spp.

The following examples are offered by way of illustration and not by wayof limitation.

EXPERIMENTAL Example 1 Extraction of Plasmid DNA

A pure culture of strain ATX13002 was grown in large quantities of richmedia. The culture was spun to harvest the cell pellet. The cell pelletwas then prepared by treatment with SDS allowing breakage of the cellwall and release of DNA. Proteins and large genomic DNA was thenprecipitated by a high salt concentration. The plasmid DNA was thentaken and precipitated by standard ethanol precipitation. The plasmidDNA was separated from any remaining chromosomal DNA by high-speedcentrifugation through a cesium chloride gradient. The DNA wasvisualized in the gradient by UV light and the lower plasmid band wasextracted using a syringe. This band contained the plasmid DNA fromstrain ATX13002. Quality of the DNA was checked by visualization on anagarose gel.

Example 2 Cloning of Genes

The purified plasmid DNA was sheared into 5-10 kb sized fragments andthe 5′ and 3′ single stranded overhangs repaired using T4 DNA polymeraseand Klenow fragment in the presence of all four dNTPs, as known in theart. Phosphates were then attached to the 5′ ends by treatment with T4polynucleotide kinase, as known in the art. The repaired DNA fragmentswere then ligated overnight into a standard high copy vector (i.e.pBluescript SK+), suitably prepared to accept the inserts as known inthe art (for example by digestion with a restriction enzyme producingblunt ends).

The quality of the library was analyzed by digesting a subset of cloneswith a restriction enzyme known to have a cleavage site flanking thecloning site. A high percentage of clones were determined to containinserts, with an average insert size of 5-6 kb.

Example 3 High Throughput Sequencing of Library Plates

Once the shotgun library quality was checked and confirmed, colonieswere grown in a rich broth in 2 ml 96-well blocks overnight at 37° C. ata shaking speed of 350 rpm. The blocks were spun to harvest the cells tothe bottom of the block. The blocks were then prepared by standardalkaline lysis prep in a high throughput format.

The end sequences of clones from this library were then determined for alarge number of clones from each block in the following way: The DNAsequence of each clone chosen for analysis was determined using thefluorescent dye terminator sequencing technique (Applied Biosystems) andstandard primers flanking each side of the cloning site. Once thereactions had been carried out in the thermocycler, the DNA wasprecipitated using standard ethanol precipitation. The DNA wasresuspended in water and loaded onto a capillary sequencing machine.Each library plate of DNA was sequenced from either end of the cloningsite, yielding two reads per plate over each insert.

Example 4 Assembly and Screening of Sequencing Data

DNA sequences obtained were compiled into an assembly project andaligned together to form contigs. This can be done efficiently using acomputer program, such as Vector NTi, or alternatively by using thePred/Phrap suite of DNA alignment and analysis programs. These contigs,along with any individual read that may not have been added to a contig,were compared to a compiled database of all classes of known pesticidalgenes. Contigs or individual reads identified as having identity to aknown endotoxin or pesticidal gene were analyzed further. A singleclone, pAX004, containing DNA showing homology to known endotoxin genes.Therefore, pAX004 was selected for further sequencing.

Example 5 Sequencing of pAX004 and Identification of AXMI-004

Primers were designed to anneal to pAX004, in a manner such that DNAsequences generated from such primers will overlap existing DNA sequenceof this clone(s). This process, known as “oligo walking”, is well knownin the art. This process was utilized to determine the entire DNAsequence of the region exhibiting homology to a known endotoxin gene. Inthe case of pAX004, this process was used to determine the DNA sequenceof the entire clone, resulting in a single nucleotide sequence. Thecompleted DNA sequence was then placed back into the original largeassembly for further validation. This allowed incorporation of more DNAsequence reads into the contig, resulting in 6-7 reads of coverage overthe entire region.

Analysis of the DNA sequence of pAX004 by methods known in the artidentified an open reading frame with homology to known delta endotoxingenes. This open reading frame is designated as AXMI-004. The DNAsequence of AXMI-004 is provided as SEQ ID NO:1, and the amino acidsequence of the predicted AMXI-004 protein is provided as SEQ ID NO:3.An alternate start site for AXMI-004 at nucleotide 385 of SEQ ID NO:1generates the amino acid sequence provided as SEQ ID NO:5.

Example 6 Homology of AXMI-004 to Known Endotoxin Genes

Searches of DNA and protein databases with the DNA sequence and aminoacid sequence of AXMI-004 reveal that AXMI-004 is homologous to knownendotoxins. FIG. 1 shows an alignment of AXMI-004 with severalendotoxins. Blast searches identify cry1Ca as having the strongest blockof homology, though the overall sequence identity in the toxic domain isonly 43% (see Table 1).

Alignment of AXMI-004 amino acid sequence with the highest scoringproteins identified by blast search.

TABLE 1 Amino Acid Identity of AXMI-004 with Exemplary Endotoxin ClassesPercent Amino Percent Amino Acid Identity to Acid Identity in EndotoxinAXMI-004 Toxic Domains cry1Ac* 17% 30% cry1Ca* 24% 43% cry2Aa 12% 12%cry3Aa 33% 33% cry1Ia 35% 37% cry7Aa 19% 31%

Example 7 Assays for Pesticidal Activity

The ability of a pesticidal protein to act as a pesticide upon a pest isoften assessed in a number of ways. One way well known in the art is toperform a feeding assay. In such a feeding assay, one exposes the pestto a sample containing either compounds to be tested, or controlsamples. Often this is performed by placing the material to be tested,or a suitable dilution of such material, onto a material that the pestwill ingest, such as an artificial diet. The material to be tested maybe composed of a liquid, solid, or slurry. The material to be tested maybe placed upon the surface and then allowed to dry. Alternatively, thematerial to be tested may be mixed with a molten artificial diet, thendispensed into the assay chamber. The assay chamber may be, for example,a cup, a dish, or a well of a microtiter plate.

Assays for sucking pests (for example aphids) may involve separating thetest material from the insect by a partition, ideally a portion that canbe pierced by the sucking mouthparts of the sucking insect, to allowingestion of the test material. Often the test material is mixed with afeeding stimulant, such as sucrose, to promote ingestion of the testcompound.

Other types of assays can include microinjection of the test materialinto the mouth, or gut of the pest, as well as development of transgenicplants, followed by test of the ability of the pest to feed upon thetransgenic plant. Plant testing may involve isolation of the plant partsnormally consumed, for example, small cages attached to a leaf, orisolation of entire plants in cages containing insects.

Other methods and approaches to assay pests are known in the art, andcan be found, for example in Robertson, J. L. & H. K. Preisler. 1992.Pesticide bioassays with arthropods. CRC, Boca Raton, Fla.Alternatively, assays are commonly described in the journals “ArthropodManagement Tests” and “Journal of Economic Entomology” or by discussionwith members of the Entomological Society of America (ESA).

Example 8 Expression of AXMI-004 in Bacillus

The 1,890 base pair insecticidal AXMI-004 gene was amplified by PCR frompAX004, and cloned into the Bacillus Expression vector pAX916 by methodswell known in the art. The resulting clone, pAX920, expressed AXMI-004protein when transformed into cells of a cry(−) Bacillus thuringiensisstrain (see FIG. 2). The Bacillus strain containing pAX920 andexpressing the 69 kD AXMI-004 insecticidal protein may be cultured on avariety of conventional growth media. A Bacillus strain containingpAX920 was grown in CYS media (10 g/l Bacto-casitone; 3 g/l yeastextract; 6 g/l KH₂PO₄; 14 g/l K₂HPO₄; 0.5 mM MgSO₄; 0.05 mM MnCl₂; 0.05mM FeSO₄), until sporulation was evident by microscopic examination.Samples were prepared, and AXMI-004 was tested for insecticidal activityin bioassays against important insect pests.

Methods

To prepare CYS media: 10 g/l Bacto-casitone; 3 g/l yeast extract; 6 g/lKH₂PO₄; 14 g/l K₂HPO₄; 0.5 mM MgSO₄; 0.05 mM MnCl₂; 0.05 mM FeSO₄. TheCYS mix should be pH 7, if adjustment is necessary. NaOH or HCl arepreferred. The media is then autoclaved and 100 ml of 10× filteredglucose is added after autoclaving. If the resultant solution is cloudyit can be stirred at room temperature to clear.

Example 9 N-Terminal Amino Acid Sequence of AXMI-004 Expressed inBacillus

Analysis of AXMI-004 expressed in Bacillus suggested that the proteinproduct detected in these cultures may be reduced in size relative tothe full-length AXMI-004 protein. Since many endotoxin proteins arecleaved at the N-terminus after expression in Bacillus, we determinedthe N-terminus of the AXMI-004 protein resulting from Bacillusexpression. Protein samples from AXMI-004 were separated on PAGE gels,and the protein transferred to PVDF membrane by methods known in theart. The protein band corresponding to AXMI-004 was excised. TheN-terminal amino acid sequence of this protein was determined by serialEdman degradation as known in the art. The sequence obtained was asfollows:

ERFDKNDALE (SEQ ID NO: 12)

Comparison of this amino acid sequence with the sequence of the fulllength AXMI-004 (SEQ ID NO:3) demonstrates that this amino sequenceresults from internal cleavage of the AXMI-004 after expression inBacillus, resulting in a protein with an N-terminus corresponding toamino acid 28 of SEQ ID NO:3 (disclosed as SEQ ID NO:5).

Example 10 Bioassay of AXMI-004 on Insect Pests

Insecticidal activity of AXMI-004 was established utilizing acceptedbioassay procedures using a sporulated Bacillus cell culture lysateexpressing AXMI-004. The Bacillus culture was grown in 50 ml CYS mediafor both standard bioassay and LC₅₀ bioassays. The cultures were thengrown for 2 to 3 days at 30° C., 250 rpm until the cells weresporulated. Sporulation was determined by examining microscopically forthe presence of spores. AXMI-004 protein samples were prepared bycentrifugation of the sporulated cultures at 12,000×g for 10 min. Thepellet was collected and resuspended in 4 ml 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0. Thesuspension was sonicated for 20 seconds (at top power using a microprobe) while placing the tube on ice. The protein concentration of thesample was determined by electrophoresis on an SDS 4-20% gradientacrylamide gel along with a known quantity of bovine serum albumin (BSA)(FIG. 2). The concentration of AXMI-004 was determined to be 0.4 μg/ul.

AXMI-004 insecticidal activity was tested using a surface treatmentbioassay with artificial diet (Multiple Species diet, SouthlandProducts, Lake Village, Ark.) prepared as known in the art. Bioassayswere carried out by applying the Bacillus culture expressing AXMI-004 tothe diet surface and allowing the surface to air-dry. Standard bioassaysutilized five eggs per well and LC₅₀ bioassays utilized ten neonateinsect larvae per well. The eggs or larvae were applied using a fine tippaintbrush. Standard surface bioassays were carried out in 24 welltissue culture plates. 40 ul of each sample was applied to each well.Since each well has a surface area of 2 cm² (plate source), a 40 μl celllysate sample contained approximately 0.4 ug/ul AXMI-004. Bioassayswhere the LC₅₀ was determined were done in 48 well tissue cultureplates, each well representing a surface area of 1 cm² (source) usingapproximately 20 ul of 0.4 μg/ul AXMI-004 per well. The final amount ofAXMI-004 protein in each bioassay was approximately 8 μg/cm². Bioassaytrays were sealed with Breathe Easy Sealing Tape (Diversified Biotech,Boston Mass.). Control samples included media only samples, and wellsthat were not treated with samples. Bioassays were then held for fivedays in the dark at 25° C. and 65% relative humidity and resultsrecorded.

TABLE 2 Insecticidal Activity of AXMI-004 Insect (Latin Name) CommonName Activity of AXMI-004 Ostrinia nubilalis European Corn Borer 100%mortality Agrotis ipsilon Black Cutworm Stunted Heliothis zea CornEarworm Stunted Spodoptera frugiperda Fall Armyworm Stunted Heliothisvirescens Tobacco Budworm 100% mortality Pectinophora gossypiella PinkBollworm  75% mortality Manduca sexta Tobacco Hornworm 100% mortalityTrichoplusia ni Cabbage Looper 100% mortality

AXMI-004 showed strong insecticidal activity (100% mortality) againstOstrinia nubilalis and Heliothis virescens. AXMI-004 also showedinsecticidal activity of 50-75% mortality against Pectinophoragossypiella. A concentration of 43 μg/cm² AXMI-004 gave 70% mortalityagainst Pectinophora gossypiella. AXMI-004 severely stunted the growthof Agrotis ipsilon, Heliothis zea, and Spodoptera frugiperda.

Example 11 Quantitation of AXMI-004 Insecticidal Activity AgainstHeliothis virescens and Ostrinia nubilalis

The LC₅₀ of AXMI-004 protein on Ostrinia nubilalis and Heliothisvirescens larvae were determined by testing a range of AXMI-004 proteinconcentrations in insect bioassays, and applying these protein samplesto the surface of insect diet. Mortality was recorded at each proteinconcentration and analyzed using a Probit analysis program. Results weresignificant at the 95% confidence interval. Since assays were performedby surface contamination, LC₅₀s were determined assuming that the entireprotein sample remained at the surface during the assay, with littlediffusion below the level ingested by the insects. Thus, the valuesdetermined may somewhat underestimate the toxicity of the AXMI-004protein on the tested insects.

TABLE 3 LC₅₀ of AXMI-004 on Ostrinia nubilalis AXMI-004 (μg/ml) #dead/total % Mortality 1000 40/46 86.9 500 28/45 62.2 250 16/43 32.7 12512/38 31.6

LC₅₀=297 ng/cm²; 95% CI=218-384.

TABLE 4 LC5₀ of AXMI-004 on Heliothis virescens AXMI-004 (μg/ml) #dead/total % Mortality 8000 35/47 74.5 4000 26/44 59.1 2000 18/42 42.91000  6/27 22.2 500  4/36 11.1 250  2/37 5.4

LC₅₀=2874 ng/cm²; 95% CI=2189-3933

Example 12 Quantitation of AXMI-004 Insecticidal Activity Against Lyguslineolaris

Bacterial lysates were prepared by growing the Bacillus in 50 ml of CYSmedia for 60 hours. The Bacillus culture was then centrifuged at 12,000rpm for ten minutes and the supernatant discarded. The pellet wasresuspended in 5 ml of 20 mM Tris HCl at pH 8.

Bioassays were performed by cutting both the tip and the cap off anEppendorf tube to form a feeding chamber. The insecticidal protein orcontrol was presented to the insect in a solution that was poured intothe cap and covered with parafilm (Pechiney Plastic Packaging, ChicagoIll.) that the insect could pierce upon feeding. The Eppendorf tube wasplaced back on the cap top down and 1^(st) or 2^(nd) instar Lygus nymphswere placed into the Eppendorf chamber with a fine tip brush. The cutEppendorf tube tip was sealed with parafilm creating an assay chamber.The resultant assay chamber was incubated at ambient temperature capside down. Insecticidal proteins were tested in a solution of 15%glucose at a concentration of 66 ug/ml.

TABLE 5 Insecticidal Activity of AXMI-004 on Lygus lineolaris ProteinNo. Dead/Total % Mortality AXMI-004 2/4 50% Control 0/9  0%

Example 13 Vectoring of AXMI-004 for Plant Expression

The AXMI-004 coding region DNA is operably connected with appropriatepromoter and terminator sequences for expression in plants. Suchsequences are well known in the art and may include the rice actinpromoter or maize ubiquitin promoter for expression in monocots, theArabidopsis UBQ3 promoter or CaMV 35S promoter for expression in dicots,and the nos or PinII terminators. Techniques for producing andconfirming promoter-gene-terminator constructs also are well known inthe art.

The plant expression cassettes described above are combined with anappropriate plant selectable marker to aid in the selections oftransformed cells and tissues, and ligated into plant transformationvectors. These may include binary vectors from Agrobacterium-mediatedtransformation or simple plasmid vectors for aerosol or biolistictransformation.

Example 14 Transformation of Maize Cells with AXMI-004

Maize ears are collected 8-12 days after pollination. Embryos areisolated from the ears, and those embryos 0.8-1.5 mm in size are usedfor transformation. Embryos are plated scutellum side-up on a suitableincubation media, such as DN62A5S media (3.98 g/L N6 Salts; 1 mL/L (of1000× Stock) N6 Vitamins; 800 mg/L L-Asparagine; 100 mg/L Myo-inositol;1.4 g/L L-Proline; 100 mg/L Casaminoacids; 50 g/L sucrose; 1 mL/L (of 1mg/l mL Stock) 2,4-D), and incubated overnight at 25° C. in the dark.

The resulting explants are transferred to mesh squares (30-40 perplate), transferred onto osmotic media for 30-45 minutes, thentransferred to a beaming plate (see, for example, PCT Publication No.WO/0138514 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,240,842).

DNA constructs designed to express AXMI-004 in plant cells areaccelerated into plant tissue using an aerosol beam accelerator, usingconditions essentially as described in PCT Publication No. WO/0138514.After beaming, embryos are incubated for 30 min on osmotic media, thenplaced onto incubation media overnight at 25° C. in the dark. To avoidunduly damaging beamed explants, they are incubated for at least 24hours prior to transfer to recovery media. Embryos are then spread ontorecovery period media, for 5 days, 25° C. in the dark, then transferredto a selection media. Explants are incubated in selection media for upto eight weeks, depending on the nature and characteristics of theparticular selection utilized. After the selection period, the resultingcallus is transferred to embryo maturation media, until the formation ofmature somatic embryos is observed. The resulting mature somatic embryosare then placed under low light, and the process of regeneration isinitiated by methods known in the art. The resulting shoots are allowedto root on rooting media, and the resulting plants are transferred tonursery pots and propagated as transgenic plants.

Materials

DN62A5S Media Components per liter Source Chu'S N6 Basal 3.98 g/LPhytotechnology Labs Salt Mixture (Prod. No. C 416) Chu's N6 1 mL/L (of1000x Phytotechnology Labs Vitamin Stock) Solution (Prod. No. C 149)L-Asparagine 800 mg/L Phytotechnology Labs Myo-inositol 100 mg/L SigmaL-Proline 1.4 g/L Phytotechnology Labs Casaminoacids 100 mg/L FisherScientific Sucrose 50 g/L Phytotechnology Labs 2,4-D (Prod. No. 1 mL/L(of 1 mg/mL Sigma D-7299) Stock)

Adjust the pH of the solution to pH to 5.8 with 1N KOH/1N KCl, addGelrite (Sigma) to 3 g/L, and autoclave. After cooling to 50° C., add 2ml/L of a 5 mg/ml stock solution of Silver Nitrate (PhytotechnologyLabs). Recipe yields about 20 plates.

Example 15 Transformation of AXMI-004 into Plant Cells byAgrobacterium-Mediated Transformation

Ears are collected 8-12 days after pollination. Embryos are isolatedfrom the ears, and those embryos 0.8-1.5 mm in size are used fortransformation. Embryos are plated scutellum side-up on a suitableincubation media, and incubated overnight at 25° C. in the dark.However, it is not necessary per se to incubate the embryos overnight.Embryos are contacted with an Agrobacterium strain containing theappropriate vectors for Ti plasmid mediated transfer for 5-10 min, andthen plated onto co-cultivation media for 3 days (25° C. in the dark).After co-cultivation, explants are transferred to recovery period mediafor five days (at 25° C. in the dark). Explants are incubated inselection media for up to eight weeks, depending on the nature andcharacteristics of the particular selection utilized. After theselection period, the resulting callus is transferred to embryomaturation media, until the formation of mature somatic embryos isobserved. The resulting mature somatic embryos are then placed under lowlight, and the process of regeneration is initiated as known in the art.The resulting shoots are allowed to root on rooting media, and theresulting plants are transferred to nursery pots and propagated astransgenic plants.

All publications and patent applications mentioned in the specificationare indicative of the level of skill of those skilled in the art towhich this invention pertains. All publications and patent applicationsare herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if eachindividual publication or patent application was specifically andindividually indicated to be incorporated by reference.

Although the foregoing invention has been described in some detail byway of illustration and example for purposes of clarity ofunderstanding, it will be obvious that certain changes and modificationsmay be practiced within the scope of the appended claims.

1. An isolated polypeptide selected from the group consisting of: a) apolypeptide comprising the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:3 or 5; b) apolypeptide encoded by the nucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO:1, 2, or 4,wherein said polypeptide has pesticidal activity; c) a polypeptidecomprising an amino acid sequence having at least 90% sequence identityto the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:3 or 5, wherein said polypeptidehas pesticidal activity; and, d) a polypeptide that is encoded by anucleotide sequence that is at least 90% identical to the nucleotidesequence of SEQ ID NO:1, 2, or 4, wherein said polypeptide haspesticidal activity.
 2. The polypeptide of claim 1, wherein saidpolypeptide is selected from the group consisting of: a) a polypeptidecomprising an amino acid sequence having at least 95% sequence identityto the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:3 or 5, wherein said polypeptidehas pesticidal activity; and, b) a polypeptide that is encoded by anucleotide sequence that is at least 95% identical to the nucleotidesequence of SEQ ID NO:1, 2, or 4, wherein said polypeptide haspesticidal activity.
 3. The polypeptide of claim 1, further comprising aheterologous amino acid sequence.
 4. An antibody that selectively bindsto a polypeptide of claim
 1. 5. A composition comprising the polypeptideof claim
 1. 6. The composition of claim 5, wherein said composition isselected from the group consisting of a powder, dust, pellet, granule,spray, emulsion, colloid, and solution.
 7. The composition of claim 6,wherein said composition is prepared by desiccation, lyophilization,homogenization, extraction, filtration, centrifugation, sedimentation,or concentration of a culture of Bacillus thuringiensis cells.
 8. Thecomposition of claim 6, comprising from about 1% to about 99% by weightof said polypeptide.
 9. A method for controlling a lepidopteran orcoleopteran pest population comprising contacting said population with apesticidally-effective amount of a polypeptide of claim
 1. 10. A methodfor killing a lepidopteran or coleopteran pest, comprising contactingsaid pest with, or feeding to said pest, a pesticidally-effective amountof a polypeptide of claim 1.